Shostakovich, Cello Concerto No. 1

Some works in the history of music have clear stories that relate to their composition. Mozart’s Requiem and his final illness and death, Beethoven’s anger at Napoleon and the Eroica (Third) Symphony, and Dvorak’s time spent in Iowa and his New World (Ninth) Symphony come to mind. But the history of Shostakovich’s First Cello Concerto cannot be so easily categorized. In fact, the stories of its composition range from a light tale to the dark days of Russian history.

Rostropovich and Shostakovich

Cellist Mstislav Rostropovich was a great fan of Shostakovich’s music, and the two friends frequently performed chamber music together with the composer playing piano. The cellist was looking to expand the repertoire for his instrument and wanted Shostakovich to compose a concerto for the string virtuoso to play on his international tours. But he did not know how to broach the subject with the composer.

Enter Mrs. Shostakovich

With some savvy thinking, Rostropovich thought it would be a good idea to ask Shostakovich’s wife, Nina Vasilyevna, what she thought. The cellist later remembered their conversation: “Nina Vasilyevna, what should I do to make Dmitri Dmitriyevich write me a cello concerto?” She answered, “Slava (Rostropovich), if you want Dmitri Dmitriyevich to write something for you, the only recipe I can give you is this—never ask him or talk to him about it.'”

Shostakovich reading Pravda

Of course the wife knew best, and a while later, Rostropovich read in the morning newspaper that Shostakovich had indeed written a cello concerto. Later that day, the composer asked if he could dedicate the work to the cellist, and Rostropovich immediately and humbly agreed.

As is often the case with premieres, the schedule leading up to the first performance was somewhat rushed. Shortly after he received the score, Rostropovich met with the composer to play the new work for him. Shostakovich searched his dacha for a stand to hold the music, but the cellist said no stand was needed. He had memorized the work in four days!

Some Dark Days of Soviet Russia

The concerto was composed in 1959 during a period when the Soviet rulers exerted great control over the actions of its citizens. Shostakovich once said that he was forced to read an official speech “like the paltriest wretch, a parasite, a puppet, a cut-out paper doll on a string.” Another composer commented that “the circumstances Shostakovich lived under were unbearably cruel, more than anyone should have to endure.”

How can a composer exist in such an atmosphere and still be creative and prolific? One of the ways that Shostakovich survived was to use satire in his music as an attempt to mock the Soviet leaders. In the Cello Concerto, he took part of Stalin’s favorite song, “Suliko”, and buried it in the fourth movement. It was so well hidden that Rostropovich did not even recognize this song until the composer carefully pointed it out to him.

Mocking Stalin

One would think that using Stalin’s favorite song would be an honor to the leader. That was certainly not the case here as Shostakovich had already used this music in a cantata to “caricature the Little Father of the People”, as one reviewer wrote. Another social commentator described the music as “gaunt, harsh, and rhythmic, and could very well bear the imprint of hints of the terrible years in Shostakovich’s life.”

Today we have a work that Mrs. Shostakovich told Mstislav Rostropovich to wait for, but in which Mr. Shostakovich did not wait to embed his mockery of the Soviet authorities.  Thankfully, performances of it today are a long way away from the darker days of Soviet Russia.

This program note first appeared in Greensboro, North Carolina’s News and Record on October 17, 2010.

Posted in Classical Music and Performers, Greensboro Symphony Classical Concerts | Comments Off on Shostakovich, Cello Concerto No. 1

Julie Albers – Rising Star of the Cello World

Julie Albers has led a remarkable life as a cellist, having performed around the world by the time she was just 21. And all of this started in small town of Longmont, Colorado.

The Albers family was quite musical, so when Julie was born in 1980, her mother was already thinking about the instrument to teach her daughter. This turned out to be violin, which Julie started when she was two. By the time she was four, she had switched to cello, the instrument she would master and be her life’s musical focus.

By the time she reached high school, Julie was advanced enough on the cello to move to Cleveland where she joined the Young Artist Program of the Cleveland Institute of Music. Richard Aaron was her teacher. She quickly progressed at the Cleveland Institute, and made her orchestral debut with the Cleveland Orchestra when she was just seventeen.

Following the orchestral debut, Julie performed in recital and with orchestras in the U.S., Europe, Korea, Taiwan and New Zealand. In her early twenties, she was successful in several important international competitions. In Germany, she won second prize in in Munich’s Internationalen Musikwettbewerbes der ARD, and was also awarded the Wilhelm-Weichsler-Musikpreis der Stadt Osnabruch . And in 2003, she was named the first Gold Medal Laureate of South Korea’s Gyeongnam International Music Competition, winning the $25,000 Grand Prize. While Julie was in Germany for the first competiton, she recorded solo and chamber music of Kodaly for the Bavarian Radio, performances that have been heard throughout Europe.

Back to Top.

Back in North America, Julie has performed with many important orchestras and ensembles. In 2009, her engagements included performances with the Florida Orchestra, and the Utah, Vancouver, San Diego, Edmonton, Memphis, Syracuse, West Virginia, Santa Rosa, Brevard and Fairfax Symphony Orchestras. She also performed in recital at the University of Wyoming, Laramie, where ex-Greensboro Symphony Orchestra concertmaster John Fadial teaches.

Julie (left) with members of CELLO

In addition to solo performances, Julie is an active chamber musician. She has had a two-year residency with the Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center, and performs with a cello quartet appropriately named CELLO. She is also a Distinguished Artist of the McDuffie Center for Strings at Mercer University. Her debut album on the Artek label was released in 2005, and includes works by Rachmaninoff, Beethoven, Schumann, Massenet, and Piatagorsky.

Returning to what I wrote earlier, it may be been an understatement to say that Julie was born into a musical family. Julie has two equally talented string-playing sisters. Violinist Laura is the Associate Concertmaster of the San Francisco Opera and studied at the Cleveland Institute and The Juilliard School. Violist Rebecca was just hired as the Associate Concertmaster of the Minnesota Orchestra, and also studied at The Juilliard School. Together the sisters perform as the Albers Trio.

And it all started in Longmont, Colorado.

This article originally appeared in Greensboro, North Carolina’s News and Record on October 10, 2010.

Posted in Classical Music and Performers, Greensboro Symphony Classical Concerts | Leave a comment

Mozart’s Unmarked Grave

angel in mourning beside Mozart's unmarked graveIn all large cities, there are places to escape the hustle and bustle. In Vienna, one of the quietest sites is St. Marx Cemetery. As you enter the gates that are more than two centuries old, you’ll walk up a gently sloping, pebble-lined path surrounded by a beautiful canopy of Chestnut trees. After walking past rows and rows of grave stones, you will come across a large, open, grassy area: the Schachtgraber, or communal graves. Somewhere nearby is where Mozart is buried. On the left, you’ll see a sign directing you to his monument, an angel in mourning. There could be no better memorial for the wonderful composer who died too young.

Unfortunately no one knows exactly where Mozart is buried.  The circumstances surrounding this have fueled much speculation and storytelling.  Some believe that Mozart was so poor that his family could not afford a funeral. (They could.)  Others have said he had no friends and that no one cared.  Some have even thought that Constanze was not concerned enough to attend her late husband’s funeral. (She was ill from grieving.) Although we can never learn all the details of his burial, recent research has given us better information.

sign directing to Mozart's monumentFollowing Mozart’s consecration at St. Stephen’s Cathedral, his remains were taken in a horse drawn wagon to St. Marx Cemetery.  It was not the custom of the day for anyone to accompany a body to the grave site. A few of his friends and students still attempted to travel with the corpse. They got as far as the city gates and had to stop because of the horrible weather and the speed of the wagon. Taking the body to the cemetery was simple and speedy transportation, not a solemn procession.

There were four classes of burials in Vienna at the time: first class, second class, third class, and pauper. The pauper’s interment was the same as third class, but required no fee.  Mozart had a third-class burial. The majority of burials listed on St. Stephen’s death register in late 1791 were third-class. Mozart’s was third class, as was suggested to Constanze in order to save money.

The modest burial may also have been keeping with Emperor Joseph II’s decree of 1784, which advocated simple burials in the interest of hygiene and economy. The decree also encouraged sack burials in communal graves and forbade memorial headstones. The policy was later withdrawn because of popular opposition.  Unfortunately, that was too late for Mozart. He was buried in an anonymous, mass grave.

music lover at Mozart's grave

Many music lovers like to place a flower in front of a beloved composer. This is Robert from a 2007 trip.

The burial grounds at the time, especially those outside the city limits, were very different from the attractive, landscaped cemeteries seen today. Interment was in rather bleak surroundings. Headstones were only permitted on the cemetery walls. There might have been an occasional bush or tree between rows of plots. Visitation was rare.

In the early 1844, Constanze returned to St. Marx to attempt to find where Mozart was buried. The gravedigger from 1791 was now long dead and the graves from that year had been dug up and reused. The bones that had surfaced were reburied. All that could be learned was that graves from that year were probably in the third or fourth row down from the memorial cross. In 1855, another inquiry yielded no additional information, but chose the location for the memorial.

Several monuments have been on this spot. The first, from 1855, was moved the Central Cemetery in 1891. Around 1900, a cemetery attendant built another memorial using parts from old gravestones. The memorial today, a mourning angel next to a broken pillar is a simple and moving reminder of Mozart’s premature death.

Read about other cemeteries of great musicians that are part of In Mozart’s Footsteps trips.

Memorial for Mozart's unmarked grave

Posted in Classical Music and Performers, Vienna's Musical History | 2 Comments

Mozart’s Requiem: The Real Story of Mozart, Salieri, and Amadeus

The movie Amadeus made Mozart a household name.  It did more to bring his music into everyday life than a thousand concerts and compact disks.  Peter Shaffer’s screenplay is an inspired piece of storytelling.  It tells of how Antonio Salieri plotted to defeat Mozart.  It is full of imagination and intrigue.  Unfortunately, it is not 100% true.  Let us separate fact from fiction regarding Mozart’s death.

The ceiling of Mozart's bedroom

The ceiling of Mozart's bedroom. The apartment is now part of "Mozarthaus Vienna", a three-story museum right behind St. Stephen's Cathedral.

For many years it was believed that Mozart was poisoned.  These rumors started as early as New Year’s Eve, 1791.  An obituary in the Berlin’s Musikalische Wochenblatt reported Mozart is—dead.  He was sickly when he returned home from Prague and remained ailing since then . . . Because his body swelled up after his death, it is even believed that he was poisoned.

At times Mozart even believed this.  When he was working on the Requiem he told his wife,  “I feel it very acutely.  It won’t be long now: I’ve surely been given poison!  I can’t let go of that thought.” Constanze never believed it.

Where Mozart died

Rauhensteingasse 8, where Mozart died, with St. Stephen's in the background.

The story strengthened when Salieri “confessed” that he poisoned Mozart. Salieri was delusional in the last years of his life.  But few of the people who heard his “confession” believed him.  Shortly before his death, Salieri put the record straight.  He said, although this is my last illness, I can assure you on my word of honor that there is no truth to that absurd rumor; you know that I am supposed to have poisoned Mozart.

The Russian dramatist Aleksander Pushkin must have believed the rumors.  In 1830, he wrote a short play in which Salieri does poison Mozart. It is aptly titled “Mozart and Salieri.”

If Mozart was not poisoned, then how did he die?  The cause of death was first thought to be  “feverish prickly heat.” Later it was thought to be a “liver condition with terminal uremia.”  Currently two theories exist.  A 1972 report suggests rheumatic fever.  A more recent study proposes that Mozart had the following sequence of illnesses in his final three weeks: streptococcal infection, Schönlein-Henoch Syndrome, renal failure, venesection(s), cerebral hemorrhage, terminal broncho-pneumonia.

Mozart's Crucifix Chapel

A Fiaker (Viennese Horse-Drawn Carriage) in front of the Crucifix Chapel, site of Mozart's consecration.

Finally, let’s look at the Requiem.  Was the commission conceived by Salieri as a way to drive Mozart mad?  No.  Was it some malicious plot to make Mozart believe he was writing a requiem for himself?  No.  Was it commissioned by an anonymous messenger?  Yes, and that is where we need to begin.

Count Franz Walsegg-Stuppach was a music lover and wealthy landowner from Lower Austria.  On February 14, 1791, his young wife died.  He came up an idea. He would commission Mozart to write a requiem mass that he would pass off as his own. It would be performed on the anniversary of his wife’s death.  Walsegg-Stuppach asked a neighbor to be an anonymous messenger and contact the composer. The neighbor was Turkish. The foreign accent may have confused Mozart.

Even after Mozart’s death, the Walsegg-Stuppach persisted with his deception. He copied the music (which had been completed by Mozart’s students) into his own handwriting.  On December 11, 1793, he conducted it. It was entitled, “Requiem, composto del Conte Walsegg”!

Sites to visit:

Rauensteingasse 8

The site where Mozart died on December 5, 1791. Now a modern (and rather ugly!) department store with a plaque dedicated to Mozart.

St. Stephen’s Cathedral

Mozart’s memorial was at the Crucifix Chapel, at the exit of the catacombs tour. There is a small memorial you can see from the outside of the building.

Domgasse 5

A three-floor museum called “Mozarthaus Vienna”. Mozart lived here 1784-1787.  It was his home that was depicted in “Amadeus” although he died in another home (Rauhensteingasse 9, above). This museum is one of my Top 5 Musical Sites in Vienna.

Michaelerkirche (St. Michael’s Church, across from the entrance to the Hofburg)

The parts of the Requiem that Mozart completed were performed here just five days after his death. You can see two plaques commemorating this to the right as you enter the church.

Prater

Vienna’s largest park. Mozart and his wife were walking here when he told her that he felt he had been poisoned.

Starbucks at the Hofburg in Vienna Austria

Vienna has some of the most famous coffee houses in the world, but you can still go to Starbucks across from the Hofburg!

Posted in Classical Music and Performers, Vienna's Musical History | Leave a comment

Back to the top.